 
    
Crafting Shipwrecks in Havana: A Prelude
Margarita Zamora, University of Wisconsin
  In 1908, the  young Cuban writer, caricaturist, and amateur painter Jesús Castellanos,  traveled to Paris. It is not difficult  to imagine the details of a likely itinerary that would place him in the Louvre  one autumn day in that same year. There,  on the first floor in the Grande Gallerie which houses the largest paintings in  the museum’s collection, he would not have missed the immense canvas hanging  almost at floor level. The artist himself had requested it be placed down low  so that the spectator could take full measure of the life-size depiction of the  raft and its occupants, and perhaps imagine stepping into the tragic  scene.
     In 1908, the  young Cuban writer, caricaturist, and amateur painter Jesús Castellanos,  traveled to Paris. It is not difficult  to imagine the details of a likely itinerary that would place him in the Louvre  one autumn day in that same year. There,  on the first floor in the Grande Gallerie which houses the largest paintings in  the museum’s collection, he would not have missed the immense canvas hanging  almost at floor level. The artist himself had requested it be placed down low  so that the spectator could take full measure of the life-size depiction of the  raft and its occupants, and perhaps imagine stepping into the tragic  scene.   
           Castellanos would be standing at the foot  of Théodore Géricault’s masterpiece, “Le radeau de la Méduse” (“Raft of the  Medusa”). The painting represents a  makeshift raft crowded with the survivors of a shipwreck, adrift in roiling  seas as storm clouds close in.  The raft  fills most of the 4.91 x 7. 17 meters of canvas, but only a small part of its  surface is visible because it is strewn with bodies upon bodies; some in the  last stage of survival, some still alive enough to hope for rescue, while  others, lifeless already, dangle limbs over the water. A man clings to a boy’s corpse to keep it  from sliding into the deep.  Next to  them, a bust has lost its pelvis and lower extremities, to ravenous sharks  perhaps. The chiaroscuro illumines  tortured flesh, but it is difficult to make out most of the faces. Muscle and  sinew are left to speak the horror and despair. A strong diagonal draws the spectator’s eyes to the right upper quadrant  of the canvas, where two figures with backs turned to the viewer are waving  pieces of cloth toward an object in the distance. In a plane just behind them, other survivors  reach out in the same direction with arms outstretched toward the far  horizon. Following their gaze, the  spectator can barely make out the faint outline of what seems like a sail  receding into the distant gash of light.
           An occasional reviewer of the arts,  Castellanos oddly left no record of a visit to the Louvre. Yet it seems  inconceivable, that his sojourn in Paris in the autumn of 1908 would not have  included a visit to one of the world’s most renowned art museums. Whether he sought out Géricault’s masterpiece  or simply stumbled upon it, the startling canvas must have impressed the  visitor from an island accustomed to disasters at sea. He may have learned then that “The Raft of  the Medusa” was inspired by a true story of shipwreck; a story that must have  impressed Castellanos as much the painting itself. Géricault’s massive oleo depicts the  aftermath of the most publicized sea disaster of the nineteenth century:  the wreck of the French frigate, “Méduse,”  which ran aground on the Bank of Arguin in 1816, during a mission to reassert  control of the French colony in Senegal. The incident became notorious in the press for the incompetence,  irresponsibility, and inhumanity of the ship’s captain. Hugue Duroy de  Chaumereys, a royalist loyal to the Bourbon monarchy of the Restoration  appointed to the helm thanks to his political connections. When the ship ran aground because of  Chaumerey’s   unfamiliarity with the  treacherous waters off the West African coast, 149 people were left to fend for  themselves in a makeshift raft while the officials and their families rowed to  safety. For two weeks they drifted in  the ocean enduring thirst, hunger, rebellion, and cannibalism after the rope  that secured the raft to the captain’s boat was severed. Only 15 of the original 149 survived the  ordeal.
 impressed the  visitor from an island accustomed to disasters at sea. He may have learned then that “The Raft of  the Medusa” was inspired by a true story of shipwreck; a story that must have  impressed Castellanos as much the painting itself. Géricault’s massive oleo depicts the  aftermath of the most publicized sea disaster of the nineteenth century:  the wreck of the French frigate, “Méduse,”  which ran aground on the Bank of Arguin in 1816, during a mission to reassert  control of the French colony in Senegal. The incident became notorious in the press for the incompetence,  irresponsibility, and inhumanity of the ship’s captain. Hugue Duroy de  Chaumereys, a royalist loyal to the Bourbon monarchy of the Restoration  appointed to the helm thanks to his political connections. When the ship ran aground because of  Chaumerey’s   unfamiliarity with the  treacherous waters off the West African coast, 149 people were left to fend for  themselves in a makeshift raft while the officials and their families rowed to  safety. For two weeks they drifted in  the ocean enduring thirst, hunger, rebellion, and cannibalism after the rope  that secured the raft to the captain’s boat was severed. Only 15 of the original 149 survived the  ordeal.
           Among the survivors were the ship’s  surgeon, Dr. Henri Savigny, and Alexandre Corréard, the expedition’s  geographical engineer, collaborators on a testimonial account—Narrative of a Voyage to Senegal in 1816—that  exposed the government’s  failure in its duties to its citizens. Defying the  secrecy and censorship surrounding the disaster, Corréard and Savigny reworked  the original account, adding illustrations and corroborating testimony with  each new edition. A series of engravings by Géricault were included in the  lavish third edition of the five that were published in as many years.(1) Géricault’s collaboration on the edition and his friendship with Corréard, who  had been in and out of prison for the publication of a text deemed “seditious”  by Bourbon officials, suggests that he sympathized with the liberal  opposition.  But it was the monumental  canvas that immortalized the shipwreck Corréard and Savigny’s narrative had  exposed as the height of governmental irresponsibility and incompetence,  testifying to the painter’s larger ethical political concerns.
failure in its duties to its citizens. Defying the  secrecy and censorship surrounding the disaster, Corréard and Savigny reworked  the original account, adding illustrations and corroborating testimony with  each new edition. A series of engravings by Géricault were included in the  lavish third edition of the five that were published in as many years.(1) Géricault’s collaboration on the edition and his friendship with Corréard, who  had been in and out of prison for the publication of a text deemed “seditious”  by Bourbon officials, suggests that he sympathized with the liberal  opposition.  But it was the monumental  canvas that immortalized the shipwreck Corréard and Savigny’s narrative had  exposed as the height of governmental irresponsibility and incompetence,  testifying to the painter’s larger ethical political concerns.  
           Géricault did extensive research for the  “Raft of the Medusa” that included observations of cadavers in various stages  of decomposition, the construction of a model of the raft, and interviews with  the survivors. He then produced several  studies. Thanks to one of those studies we know that the elusive object on the  far horizon that captured the attention of the castaways was in fact the  frigate “Argus” that would eventually rescue them. For the final version of the painting,  however, Géricault decided to depict the raft and its occupants in the moment  of greatest tension, suspended between waves of hope and despair, when  salvation appeared at last in the distance only to vanish with the receding  “Argus,” which missed the raft on its first pass.
 and its occupants in the moment  of greatest tension, suspended between waves of hope and despair, when  salvation appeared at last in the distance only to vanish with the receding  “Argus,” which missed the raft on its first pass.  
           An important aspect of Géricault’s  masterpiece is the exquisitely nuanced way it straddles the boundary between  the ethical and the political. Working the paradigm of shipwreck as abandonment  inherited from his Romantic predecessors, Géricault added ethical political  bite in two striking innovations: the depiction of the mixed social class and  racial composition of the group of castaways and the ironic inversion that  rendered the promise of rescue on the horizon as a false of hope. 
      Jesús Castellanos’s reading of Géricault’s  masterpiece became Cuba’s first great short story, “La agonía de La Garza;” a  narrative about a humble shipwreck off the Matanzas coast that testifies to the  ethical and political failures of the island’s first post-colonial  government. That story sparked the  editor’s interest in the theme of shipwreck, an interest that ultimately led  her to this special issue of La Habana  Elegante. It is fitting, therefore,  that “Naufragios/Shipwrecks” be dedicated to the memory of Castellanos, who  taught later generations of Cuban writers and readers that it is not about the  sea but the shipwreck.
Nota
1. Jonathan Miles, The Wreck of the Medusa: the Most Famous Sea Disaster of the Nineteenth Century, (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2007) is the most complete source on the history of the wreck and Correárd and Savigny’s account.
 
  